Multi-provider AI search intelligence

Every AI answer has a paper trail.

Ask OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini the same question. Get the searches they reveal, the pages they cite, and the answer differences that matter without digging through tabs or spreadsheets.

Investigation / best Outscraper alternative / live evidenceComplete in 28.6s
best Outscraper alternative
->
AI answers3 providersSearchesCitationsReport
01OpenAIbest Outscraper alternative Google Maps scraping4 sources
02ClaudeOutscraper vs Apify pricing API reviews5 sources
03GeminiGoogle Maps lead scraping tools comparison2 sources
04OpenAIalternatives to Outscraper for teams4 sources
05ClaudeOutscraper alternatives small business3 sources

Source audit

See which pages shaped the answer and why.

Every cited URL is normalized, fetched, and enriched with titles, headings, status, content type, and page text.

14

Citations

9

Domains

6

Themes

Outscraper comparison

apify.com

Comparison

Lead data extraction

serpapi.com

Official

Scraping infrastructure

brightdata.com

Comparison

Places API

developers.google.com

Authority
Evidence exported: queries, citations, page structure, answers, article blueprintAuditable by source
OpenAI
Claude
Gemini
Search traces
Cited pages
Answer comparison

The answer is only half the story

Trace the path from prompt to proof.

LLM Sleuth keeps each provider's answer connected to the evidence behind it, so your team can inspect, compare, and reuse the research.

01 / Search Trace

best local scraping tool 2026out scrapers api pricingclay enrichment waterfall

See what each provider searched.

Capture the provider-exposed query strings from web tool calls, response metadata, and grounding data.

02 / Source Audit

DocsReviewPricingBlog

Inspect the pages behind the answer.

Fetch cited URLs and extract page text, headings, FAQ schema, redirects, status codes, and content types.

03 / Answer Delta

OpenAIClaudeGemini

Find where the models agree and diverge.

Compare final recommendations beside the evidence that produced them, not a disconnected chat transcript.

Turn evidence into action

Leave with a brief, not a pile of tabs.

Each report converts cross-provider evidence into a practical article blueprint: search intent, audience, winning angle, outline, recommended terms, must-include FAQs, and source themes.

Built to be used by a strategist, handed to a writer, or passed directly into an agent workflow.

Executive Article Blueprint

14 citations / 3 providers

Winning angle

Recommend by use case and total cost, not a single hard ranking.

Search data shows users compare alternatives from a technical, budget, and workflow lens.

H1Best Outscraper Alternatives for Maps Scraping and Lead Generation150-200
H2Quick verdict: who should use which tool250-350
H2How to choose the right alternative300-450
H2Top Outscraper alternatives compared900-1,200
H2Pricing, accuracy, and scale tradeoffs300-450
H2FAQ answers ready for AI results250-350

A reproducible research record

Built for people who need proof.

For visibility teams, researchers, agencies, and builders who need to explain where an AI answer came from and what to do next.

23

provider-exposed searches in one report

14

citations normalized and fetched

9

unique domains compared

1

decision-ready blueprint generated

API first, dashboard friendly

Give your agents a verifiable search layer.

Run the same multi-provider investigation from Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or your own product. Get a stored execution with structured queries, sources, extracted content, answers, and the final blueprint.

  • +One endpoint, multiple providers
  • +Credit-based usage with stored results
  • +Report URLs for human review
POST /api/v1/queryCopy request
curl -X POST https://llmsleuth.com/api/v1/query \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $LLM_SLEUTH_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "query": "best Outscraper alternative",
    "providers": ["openai", "anthropic", "gemini"]
  }'

23

queries

14

citations

ready

report

Pay for investigations, not seats.

One credit runs one provider. Compare all three providers for three credits. Every plan includes the dashboard and API.

Starter

$29/mo

300 provider runs

  • +3 supported providers
  • +Source and page extraction
  • +Article blueprints
  • +API and history
Choose Starter

Pro

Most popular
$39/mo

750 provider runs

  • +Everything in Starter
  • +Higher monthly volume
  • +Export-ready reports
  • +Priority source fetching
Choose Pro

Scale

$97/mo

2,500 provider runs

  • +Everything in Pro
  • +Agent and team workflows
  • +Longer result retention
  • +Early provider access
Choose Scale

Investigate one query. See the whole trail.

Your first three-provider report is free. No card required.

Run a free investigation